FileCraft vs TinyPNG
TinyPNG uses a smart lossy compression algorithm that typically achieves 60-80% size reduction. However, every image is uploaded to TinyPNG's servers in the Netherlands. FileCraft keeps your images local.
⚖️
Quick Verdict
TinyPNG produces slightly smaller files for PNG. Choose FileCraft if privacy is important or you need to compress formats beyond PNG/JPG.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | FileCraft | TinyPNG |
|---|---|---|
| File Privacy | ✓Never uploaded — 100% local | Uploaded to Dutch servers |
| Price | ✓Free forever | Free up to 20 images/month; paid API |
| Compression Quality | Good (browser Canvas) | Excellent (proprietary algorithm) |
| Format Support | ✓JPG, PNG, WebP, GIF, and more | PNG and JPG only |
| Works Offline | ✓Yes | No |
| Batch Processing | ✓Yes | Yes (paid API) |
✓ FileCraft Advantages
- •Files never uploaded to any server
- •Works 100% offline after first load
- •No account or registration required
- •Free forever, no ads
- •WebAssembly-powered near-native speed
+ TinyPNG Advantages
- •Best-in-class PNG compression algorithm
- •WordPress and CDN integrations
- •API for automated pipelines
Privacy Comparison
FileCraft
Files never leave your device. All processing happens locally in your browser using the FileCraft Engine. No server receives your files. Works completely offline after first load.
TinyPNG
TinyPNG is excellent at lossy PNG/JPEG compression but uploads every image to its servers.